Regarding the assigned case Louis Vuitton Malletier $($LVM$)$ v$.$ Haute Diggity Dog $--$

Which of the following supports the court's finding that the defendant's unauthorized trademark use is parodic? $($Select all that apply.$)$

I. "Chewy Vuiton" sounds like and rhymes with Louis Vuitton in a way that conveys a joke.

II$.$ The LVM mark is strong and famous.

III. "Chewy Vuiton" is sold with other similar parodies of other famous brands.

Group of answer choices

I & II

I, II$,$ & III

I & III

II & III