Reply to a peer about their initial post. In your replie, discuss how their situations and later court cases show a federal system and national supremacy at work. Use facts to explain why you agree or disagree with the majority ruling of the Supreme Court in each case. Hey class! My name is Josiah, and I'm a psychology major from Wisconsin. I've always been interested in politics, even though it's not my major. The Supreme Court case I chose is Trump v. Hawaii (2018). This case arose after President Donald Trump issued several executive orders restricting travel to the U.S. from certain predominantly Muslim countries. Opponents argued that the policy violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause by discriminating against Muslims and that the president exceeded his authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The federal government defended the orders as necessary for national security. In a close 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the travel ban, ruling that the president acted within his legal authority and that the policy was based on security concerns rather than religion. This decision expanded federal executive power over immigration and limited states' ability to challenge such actions. However, the ruling also drew criticism for its impact on people of color and women from Muslim-majority countries, many of whom were separated from families or denied opportunities in the U.S