Reply to this discussion post and create a positive feed back, making it only a paragraph long:

If a suspect is arrested for terrorism in the United States and needs to be questioned, I believe they should be read their Miranda warning. An argument in favor of the Miranda warning to a suspect in a terrorism case is that is the suspect's protection of constitutional rights. Regardless if a suspect is a citizen of the United States or not, if the attack occurred in the United States, the suspect should still be treated with the same rights. Reading a suspect their Miranda warning ensures the suspect's Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel. This can help the prosecution ensure that the case will be upheld and evidence won't be thrown out due to improper procedure.

An agreement against the Miranda warning given to a suspect in a terrorism case is that of a national security concern. Some may argue that reading a suspect their Miranda warning may delay crucial intelligence gathering and put the public at risk. This argument believes that interrogating a suspect without the warning could help prevent imminent attacks and potentially save lives.