reply to this post: If I were in a situation where coworkers approached me about opposing the new paid$-$time$-$off $($PTO$)$ accrual policy, my first response would be to listen without judgment, acknowledging their concerns while maintaining a neutral and professional stance. Actively listening fosters trust and can help de$-$escalate emotions before discussing possible solutions $($Cullati et al$.,2019).$ I would explain that while I understand their frustrations, it is important to evaluate both the potential benefits and drawbacks of the policy before presenting feedback to management. For example, accrued PTO can reduce the organizational risk of excessive unscheduled absences$,$ but it can also cause stress for employees who rely on immediate leave availability $($Society for Human Resource Management $[$SHRM$],$ n$.$d$.).$

$$

To help resolve the conflict, I would suggest facilitating an open dialogue between staff and leadership, where employees can share how the change may impact work$-$life balance and patient care. Encouraging constructive communication instead of resistance can reduce organizational tension and support a fair resolution $($Rehman et al$.,2021).$ If leadership understands the personal and operational implications, they may explore options such as transitional PTO or partial front$-$loading.

$$

Looking ahead, unresolved conflict over PTO policies can damage team cohesion and create divisions within the workplace $($Davison & Blackburn, $2023).$ However, if handled collaboratively, this challenge could strengthen trust between employees and leadership, improve morale, and promote a culture where policy changes are openly discussed before implementation.