Respond to Cinquetta's post. Provide a substantive reply to your peer in one or more of the following ways: Share your insight from having read your peers' posts. Expand upon your peers' comparison of using evidence and opinion. Expand upon your peers' comparison of professional and casual writing. Integrating evidence-based information into writing differs significantly from relying on opinion. Evidence-based writing involves supporting claims with credible sources such as peer-reviewed journals, scholarly articles, and data-driven research. This method enhances the validity and reliability of the argument, ensuring that conclusions are grounded in factual knowledge rather than individual beliefs (Walden University Writing Center, n.d.-a). In contrast, writing based on opinion may lack objectivity and scholarly support, which can weaken the argument and make it less persuasive in academic and professional settings. Constructive feedback and criticism also differ in tone, intention, and impact. Constructive feedback aims to guide improvement by highlighting both strengths and areas for development in a respectful and encouraging manner. It is purposeful and promotes learning and growth (Brookhart, 2017). On the other hand, criticism often emphasizes faults without providing a path forward, and it can be perceived as negative or discouraging if not delivered thoughtfully. Constructive feedback fosters collaboration and motivation, whereas criticism may hinder progress and