Respond to the assignment question(s) with complete sentences. Explain your response to the question, incorporating theory, textbook, outside resources, and personal opinions. Provide information from the course material to back up your point of view in 4-6 sentences. Pamela Lee purchased a car from Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA). The car needed to be repaired an excessive number of times, so Lee lost the use of it. She also paid $7,300 for repairs not covered by the car's warranty. That warranty included the statement "NO PAYMENT OR OTHER COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE SUCH AS, DAMAGE OR INJURY TO...PROPERTY OR LOSS OF REVENUE." Lee sued and at trial the judge instructed the jury that Lee could recover consequenial damages even though MBUSA's warrant excluded them. Was the exclusion of consequential damages unconscionable? [Lee v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 622 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. App.)]

Respond to the assignment question(s) with complete sentences. Explain your response to the question, incorporating theory, textbook, outside resources, and personal opinions. Provide information from the course material to back up your point of view in 4-6 sentences. Pamela Lee purchased a car from Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA). The car needed to be repaired an excessive number of times, so Lee lost the use of it. She also paid \$7,300 for repairs not covered by the car's warranty. That warranty included the statement "NO PAYMENT OR OTHER COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE SUCH AS, DAMAGE OR INJURY TO...PROPERTY OR LOSS OF REVENUE," Lee sued and at trial the judge instructed the jury that Lee could recover consequenial damages even though MBUSA's warrant excluded them. Was the exclusion of consequential damages unconscionable? [Lee v, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 622 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. App.)]