Rewrite and synthesize this statement:

"There are a few options for remedies for the landlords for holdover tenants. Firstly, there would be double or treble damages, where many jurisdictions allow the implementation double or triple the payment for rent or damages if a tenant willfully refuses to vacate after the end of the lease or its termination. Secondly, a lease can require a higher rent for any tenant that is holding over. But it must be either a lease provision or must be given advanced warning of the increase. Third, is for eviction and damages, where in every state there is a legal process intended to remove the tenant and recover damages for the fair rental value of the lease. It is the most basic and commonly used legal remedy to retake possession of the property.The whole progression of is about making a claim in court that the tenant is illegally occupying the property after the lease has expired. It offers landlords legal recourse to collect what is due with the official authority of the court. Fourth, would be self-help, which is any action by the landlord to permanently evict the tenant without involving court system. But some of the practices used to force eviction are prohibited. Including but not limited to changing the locks,shutting off utilities, and removing the tenant's personal property. The primary method of removal the is correct is the eviction process (an unlawful detainer action) through the court system. And the fifth is the renewal of tenancy for an additional term, where the landlord may elect to renew a holdovers lease for another term, although the lease term is limited to a year. It will likely to be seen as a periodic tenancy, the negative of taking that action is that a new tenancy is established, and the landlord could lose the initial right to bring an eviction action."