Rewrite in a essay format and not in point form with simple english grammer without deep grammer in 2000words the essay should be continous with paragraphs for each explanation on

Introduction

I work for Johnson Controls, an organization which is known to be global leader in smart building technologies and integrated solutions. We have operations in over 150 countries, our company specializes in HVAC systems, building automation, fire and security systems, and energy-efficient infrastructure. Our services span from manufacturing and installation to long-term maintenance and optimization of building systems. Johnson Controls is also well known for its commitment to sustainability, innovation, and operational excellence.

My report is going to assess the suitability of Quality Management Procedure #09as per assignment requirement and firstly we must look at the auditing Plan which my organization Johnson Controls has.

The procedure outlines a structured approach to internal auditing, including audit scheduling, scope definition, auditor responsibilities, and reporting mechanisms. Given Johnson Controls' scale, complexity, and regulatory obligations, the audit plan's effectiveness hinges on its ability to support compliance, continuous improvement, and risk management.

At first glance, the supplied audit plan appears partially appropriate for Johnson Controls. While it provides a solid framework for routine audits, it lacks the depth and flexibility required for a multinational, multi-service organization. This report will explore the strengths and limitations of the plan, suggest adaptations, and assess the competencies required for successful implementation.

Evaluation of the Audit Plan's Appropriateness

1. Audit Scope and Frequency

The supplied plan recommends conducting audits at regular intervals, typically annually or biannually, depending on risk and operational needs. For Johnson Controls, this frequency may be insufficient. The company operates in high-risk environmentssuch as data centers, hospitals, and government buildingswhere compliance with safety, environmental, and cybersecurity standards is critical.

For example, Johnson Controls' fire and security systems must comply with NFPA and UL standards. A once-a-year audit may not catch emerging risks or regulatory changes in time. A more dynamic audit schedule, based on real-time risk assessments and operational changes, would be more appropriate.

2. Audit Planning and Preparation

Procedure #09 outlines a basic planning process: defining scope, selecting auditors, and notifying departments. While this is a good starting point, Johnson Controls requires a more robust planning phase. The company's projects often involve multiple stakeholders, subcontractors, and regulatory bodies. Audit planning must include stakeholder mapping, cross-functional coordination, and integration with project timelines.

For instance, when auditing a building automation system installation, the audit team must coordinate with engineering, IT, and compliance teams. The supplied plan does not account for this level of complexity.

3. Auditor Selection and Independence

The procedure emphasizes auditor independence, stating that auditors should not audit their own work. This principle aligns well with Johnson Controls' internal audit policies. However, the plan does not specify how auditors are selected or what qualifications they must hold.

Johnson Controls requires auditors with specialized knowledge in areas like ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and cybersecurity standards. For example, an audit of a smart HVAC system must be conducted by someone familiar with BACnet protocols and energy efficiency metrics. The plan should include a competency matrix to ensure auditors are matched to audits based on expertise.

4. Audit Execution and Documentation

Procedure #09 provides a checklist-based approach to audit execution, with findings documented in a standard report format. This method is useful for consistency but may be too rigid for Johnson Controls. The company's operations vary widelyfrom manufacturing plants to service contractsso audit tools must be adaptable.

In a manufacturing audit, detailed process flow diagrams and equipment calibration records may be needed. In a service audit, customer feedback and SLA compliance data are more relevant. The plan should allow for customized audit templates and digital documentation tools to reflect these differences.

5. Reporting and Follow-Up

The plan includes a section on reporting findings and tracking corrective actions. This is a critical component, and Johnson Controls already uses platforms like SAP and ServiceNow to manage nonconformances and action plans. However, the supplied plan does not mention integration with digital systems or escalation protocols.

For example, if a cybersecurity vulnerability is found during an audit, it must be escalated immediately to the IT security team and possibly reported to external regulators. The plan should include risk-based escalation procedures and timelines for resolution.

Adapting the Plan for Johnson Controls

If the current audit plan were to be implemented at Johnson Controls, several adaptations would be necessary:

1. Risk-Based Scheduling: Replace fixed audit intervals with dynamic scheduling based on risk assessments, regulatory changes, and operational shifts.
2. Competency-Based Auditor Assignment: Develop a skills matrix to match auditors with audits based on technical expertise and certifications.
3. Flexible Audit Tools: Introduce customizable templates and digital platforms for audit execution and reporting to suit different business units.
4. Integrated Reporting Systems: Link audit findings to existing enterprise systems (e.g., SAP, ServiceNow) for real-time tracking and resolution.
5. Stakeholder Engagement: Include stakeholder analysis and cross-functional coordination in the planning phase to ensure comprehensive audits.

Improving the Plan if Deemed Appropriate

If the plan is considered generally appropriate, it could still be improved to better serve Johnson Controls:

• Add a Continuous Improvement Loop: Include a mechanism for reviewing audit effectiveness and updating procedures based on lessons learned.
• Include Auditor Development: Establish training programs and certification tracking to ensure auditors remain current with industry standards.
• Enhance Reporting Clarity: Use dashboards and visual summaries to make audit results more accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
• Embed Compliance Monitoring: Integrate audit outcomes with compliance dashboards to monitor trends and prevent repeat issues.

Auditor Competencies Required

Implementing this audit plan at Johnson Controls would require auditors with specific competencies:

• Technical Knowledge: Auditors must understand building systems, automation protocols, and industry standards (e.g., ISO, NFPA, UL).
• Regulatory Awareness: Familiarity with environmental, safety, and data protection regulations is essential.
• Analytical Skills: Ability to interpret complex data, identify patterns, and assess risk.
• Communication Skills: Auditors must communicate findings clearly to diverse audiences, from engineers to executives.
• Digital Literacy: Proficiency in audit software, data analytics tools, and enterprise platforms like SAP.

Not every auditor would be equipped to implement this plan effectively. Specialized training and experience are necessary, especially in technical and regulated environments.

Conclusion

Quality Management Procedure #09: Auditing Plan provides a solid foundation for internal audits, but it requires significant adaptation to be fully appropriate for a complex, global organization like Johnson Controls. The plan's strengthssuch as its structured approach and emphasis on documentationalign with basic audit principles. However, its limitations in flexibility, technical depth, and integration with enterprise systems make it less suitable in its current form.

To make the plan work for Johnson Controls, it must be tailored to reflect the company's operational diversity, regulatory obligations, and technological infrastructure. This includes risk-based scheduling, competency-driven auditor selection, and digital integration. Additionally, auditors must possess specialized skills and knowledge to carry out audits effectively in such a dynamic environment.

Ultimately, the success of any audit plan depends on its ability to promote transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. With thoughtful adaptation, Procedure #09 can support these goals and contribute meaningfully to Johnson Controls' commitment to quality and operational excellence