Question: River Rocks realizes that it will have to raise the financing for the acquisition of Raft Adventures by issuing new debt and equity. The acquisition

River Rocks realizes that it will have to raise the financing for the acquisition of Raft Adventures by issuing new debt and equity. The acquisition project has a net present value of $36.73 million. The firm estimates that the direct issuing costs will come to $6.58 million. How should it account for these costs in evaluating the project? Should RiverRocks proceed with the project? How should it account for these costs in evaluating the project? (Select the best choice below.) O A. The direct issuing costs should be included as a direct cost and should be amortized over the life of the project. OB. The direct issuing costs should not be included as a direct cost of the acquisition because it is sunk cost. O C. The direct issuing costs should be included as a direct cost of the acquisition, i.e., NPV = $36.73 million + $6.58 million = $43.31 million OD. The direct issuing costs should be included as a direct cost of the acquisition, i.e., NPV = $36.73 million - $6.58 million = $30.15 million Should River Rocks go ahead with the project? (Select from the drop-down menu.) River Rocks V go ahead with the project
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
