Robert, who is "Boston Strong" through$-$and$-$throwgh, is in the business of manufacturiat and selling luxury counterfeit items. He both manufactures and selle the fake soods, finclutimit fote buats, sunglasses, and shoes printed with the Louis Vaitton patterned logo$,$ out of his parent's igarage $($while$,$ at the age of $32,$ continuing to live in their basement and consuming a coplous amount of food dally. without paying a dime's worth of rent or utilities or contributing anything towards the household's UGE weekly grocery bill, which has become a sore subject$-$a real sticking point$-$between Robert and the parental figures in and around the homestead$).$ His customers rave about the look of his items, saying, "They look and feel just like the real thing!" Louis Vuitton is notified of Robert's "garage enterprise" and decides to file a petition seeking some sort of relief from a court, and fast. What equitable relief is the company most likely seeking?

Monetary damages equal to the lost profit Louis Vuitton suffered due to success of Robert's commercial enterprise.

A negative injunction, mandating Robert cease his manufacturing and selling the luxury counterfeit goods.

A positive injunction, mandating Robert stop manufacturing and selling the fake goods.

Both a negative injunction and a positive injunction, requiring Robert to immediately cease the manufacture and sale of the fake goods and compelling him to work for Louis Vuitton because his skills are legit.

Specific performance, because Louis Vuitton items are one$-$of$-$a$-$kind, meaning they are "like no other."

Both the first and second answer choices above.