Ronnie D has a problem. He needs to extend the length of semesters moving forward from $13$ weeks to $14$ weeks. He is crafting an email announcement to share this news with undergraduates. His team has put together a few options for how to start his email to the community. One of their proposal is a terrible idea. Which one would you tell Ron to definitely avoid.

$"$We have decided that you deserve more time with our excellent faculty, that you should get more education for your money, and so we will extend our time in the classroom by one week per semester," emphasizing the gains to students from the process.

$"$We have decided that you deserve more time with our excellent faculty, that you should get more education for your money, and so a four year education at Hopkins will now include $12$ weeks of classes per semester instead of $104,"$ emphasizing the gains to students from the changes and also orienting them to larger numbers where perception of change diminishes.

$"$We have decided that we must reduce our vacation time by one week per semester to accommodate more learning," emphasizing lost alternatives to time in school.

$0"$We have decided that $14$ week semesters will serve our mission better than $13$ weeks," just trying to keep things neutral.