Question: Run an exploratory factor analysis using principal axis extraction using the correlations shown below using the first nine items (exclude the bodily symptom items). Run
Run an exploratory factor analysis using principal axis extraction using the correlations shown below using the first nine items (exclude the bodily symptom items). Run a two- and three-factor solution for the remaining nine items.
Which solution(s) have empirical support?
Which solution seems more conceptually meaningful?
| Items Correlations for the Reactions-to-Tests Scales | ||||||||||||
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Ten1 | 1.000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ten2 | .657 | 1.000 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ten3 | .652 | .660 | 1.000 | | | | | | | | | |
| Wor1 | .279 | .338 | .300 | 1.000 | | | | | | | | |
| Wor2 | .290 | .330 | .350 | .644 | 1.000 | | | | | | | |
| Wor3 | .358 | .462 | .440 | .659 | .566 | 1.000 | | | | | | |
| Tirt1 | .076 | .093 | .120 | .317 | .313 | .367 | 1.000 | | | | | |
| Tirt2 | .003 | .035 | .097 | .308 | .305 | .329 | .612 | 1.000 | | | | |
| Tirt3 | .026 | .100 | .097 | .305 | .339 | .313 | .674 | .695 | 1.000 | | | |
| Body1 | .287 | .312 | .459 | .271 | .307 | .351 | .122 | .137 | .185 | 1.000 | | |
| Body2 | .355 | .377 | .489 | .261 | .277 | .369 | .196 | .191 | .197 | .367 | 1.000 | |
| Body3 | .441 | .414 | .522 | .320 | .275 | .383 | .170 | .156 | .101 | .460 | .476 | 1.000 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
To address this question we need to perform an exploratory factor analysis EFA on the given data specifically focusing on the first nine items excludi... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
