s: Write little introduction to this case 1. Applying the background on the law for product liability, why do you think some jurors found Merck liable? Applying the law again, why do you think some found the company not liable? 2. List the facts that work in Merck's favor in terms of being forthright. List the facts that work against Merck. Compare the list and offer suggestions on what Merck might have done differently in handling Vioxx issues. 3. Describe other ethical issues you see arising peripherally in this case. Write little conclusion to this case