Sally is a full$-$time UAH student. On the side, she delivers pizzas for Dominoes. She pretty much picks her shifts, but she does have to select from available shifts posted by Dominoes. She drives her own vehicle to deliver pizzas. She has to wear a Dominoes uniform, has to use an electronic device provided by Dominoes to collect payments, and gets some very basic training on being nice to customers. Drivers do not have any particular rules to follow when driving, but there is a company policy that pizzas be delivered within $30$ minutes of the order, and drivers are informed that they must meet this time$-$limit$.$ Dominoes has a manager who assigns which drivers get which deliveries. Drivers are reimbursed for their mileage and get to keep tips, but otherwise get no wages. Dominoes says the drivers are independent contractors, not employees. Sally wants to know if she is misclassified under the $$economic reality test.$$ What$$s the best answer?

Group of answer choices

Sally is likely misclassified as an independent contractor $($meaning she is an employee$)$ because she has no other customers other than Dominoes$$ customers and is economically dependent upon Dominoes for them; she delivers a product that is not her own; and the work she is performing for Dominoes is integral to Dominoes$$ business.

Sally is not misclassified. She is not economically dependent upon this work. She$$s primarily a student and just earning money on the side. Furthermore, she is permitted to $$pretty much$$ pick her own shifts and only works when she wants to$.$

Sally is not misclassified. Because the company is not paying her directly except for her mileage, a court cannot find she is an employee. To find employee status, a company must be paying the worker.

Sally is likely misclassified as an independent contractor $($meaning she is an employee$)$ because Dominoes controls where she takes the pizzas and how quickly she must get them there.