Same situation as in the previous case. This time, though, Paul is happy to see Talmart carrying his product, since it has a much higher sales volume. Samantha and Hal, however, are not happy, since Talmart's sales are cutting into their sales. So they co$-$write a letter to Paul asking him to set up one of those Retail Price Maintenance Agreements with every retailer who sells Paul's protein powder. They suggest that Paul require all of the retailers to sell the powder for at least $$44\mathrm{.}00$ for the two$-$pound container. Worried that Paul might still think that RPM agreements are always illegal, they send him a link to some explanations of the $2007$ Leegin decision. Is this OK$?$