Question: Santerre and Bennett estimated the STVC function for a sample of 55 for-profit hospitals in Texas (t-statistics are in parentheses below the estimated coefficients). In
Santerre and Bennett estimated the STVC function for a sample of 55 for-profit hospitals in Texas (t-statistics are in parentheses below the estimated coefficients).
In STVC = 1.31 + 0.47 ln q + 0.80ln w + 0.73ln QUALITY + 0.11ln CASEMIX + 0.29lnk + 0.07ln DOC + Other Factors
(0.69) (3.31) (4.42) (2.58) (1.48) (3.16) (0.88)
Adj. R2 +0.95
N=55
Where STVC = Short-run total variable cost, q = a measure of output (total inpatient day), w= average way rate or price of labor, QUALITY = a measure of quality (number of accreditations), CASEMIX= an indicator of patient case-mix (number of services), k= a measure of capital (beds), and DOC= number of admitting physicians. All variables are expressed as natural logarithms (ln), so the estimated coefficients can interpreted as elasticities.
A. How much of the varion in STVC is explained by the explanatory variables? How do you know that?
B. Which of the estimated coefficients are not stastically significant? Explain.
C. Does the estimated coefficient on output represent short-run exonomies or diseconommies of scale? Explain.
D. What are the expected signs of the coefficient estimates on w, QUALITY, and CASEMIX? Explain.
E. Provide an economic interpretation of the magnitude of the estimated coefficient on w.
F. What do the estimated coefficients on k and DOC suggest about the amount of capital and physicians at the representative hospital?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
