Scenario $1)$ After Smith had been employed by HAL as an at$-$will employee, HAL announced that the continued employment with HAL was dependent upon agreement to arbitrate all future employment disputes through the new Employee Dispute Resolution $($EDR$)$ program. A document was given to all employees explaining the program and containing the statement $$continuing employment with HAL means that you agree to resolve employment related claims against the company through this process.$$ When Smith was fired two years after this document was distributed, she sued HAL for violating her leave rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act. HAL filed a motion to compel arbitration. Should this motion be granted or denied? Why?

Identify & discuss the law that applies $-$

Identify the issue in the case $($what question needs to be answered$)-$

Apply the facts of the case to the applicable law to reach a solution $-$