SCENARIO $2$: You work for a large IT company. The company is presented with a legal directive from the federal government to divulge personal data regarding some of the company$$s customers who are suspected of wrongdoing.

You feel that this is a violation of the customers$$ privacy and you are reluctant to comply with the request. Your boss tells you the company has no choice; it must follow the law. You are told you can always resign from the company if you feel so strongly about the situation.

Instead of complying or resigning, you go public. You use the media to advocate your point of view for freedom and privacy, even while knowing that your actions will have far$-$reaching consequences. Instead of just losing your job, you risk losing your freedom and your future.

Did you do the right thing? Are you a hero of free speech or a criminal $($and possibly even a traitor$)?$ What other options were available to you? What should the company have done when you went public? What should the government do$?$

After analyzing these scenarios, explain the system security concept known as the CIA triangle.