Scenario B (Answer the next four questions based on the information given below and the material in this course.) A risk indicator algorithm was created by the government to identify people deemed to be at high risk of committing welfare benefits fraud. The system compiled multiple categories of government data, including work / trade / employment information, data on fines and other state action, tax information, property ownership information, benefits data, name, address, age, gender, postcode, data on historical compliance with laws, debt, and health data. In each city where the tool was used, it was found that it only identified specific neighborhoods with high numbers of low-income and immigrant residents. Thousands of families were wrongly accused of fraud by the tax authority. These families were forced to repay their child allowances, in some cases leading to unemployment, bankruptcies and divorces. A court decided the government's use of this algorithm breached the right to respect for privacy. The Court's judgment was mostly based on the lack of transparency in the algorithm and that the system could not be inspected to ensure no discrimination takes place. - Wait for my questions