Scenario: In $1951,$ a poor young black woman, Henrietta Lacks, was diagnosed with cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Cells taken from her during that exam were used without her knowledge or informed consent to develop the first immortal cell line. The cells, called HeLa, became one of the most important tools in medical research, vital for developing the polio vaccine, cloning, gene mapping, and more, but Henrietta Lacks, the person who was the source of these cells, was virtually unknown, and her family was never informed about what had been achieved using her cells. Although their mother's cells have been bought and sold by the billions, the Lacks family received nothing from those cell lines, and cannot even afford health insurance today.Consider the role of law and ethics in the case of Henrietta Lacks before answering the questions that follow. Think about how the ethical standards for the time $(1951)$ might be different from today. Consider Mrs$.$ Lacks' legal rights and her right to autonomy. Review the $7$ principles of health care ethics and consider how each of these principles relate to this case.Answer the following question:Imagine you are a modern$-$day health care provider involved in the care of Mrs$.$ Lacks today and you were offered financial compensation for the processing of her cells in culture.Consider questions number $1-5$ below and answer number $6.$pI$1.$ If you perform this act, have you followed relevant laws and kept within your employing company's policy?$2.$ Will this act promote a win$-$win situation for as many of the involved individuals as possible?$3.$ How would you feel if this act were to be publicized in the newspaper or other media?$4.$ Would you want your family members to know?$5.$ If you perform this act, can you look at yourself in the mirror?$6.$ Based on your answers to number $1-5$ above, would this be considered an unethical act?