Score Card Rubric for Effectively Written College-level Essays (Scaled for 60 pts.) Evaluation Conceptual Thesis Development
Question:
Score Card Rubric for Effectively Written College-level Essays – (Scaled for 60 pts.)
Evaluation | Conceptual | Thesis | Development and Substantiation | Organizational Structure | Use of Language |
Very Well Developed (12 pts.) | has cogent analysis, shows command of interpretive and conceptual tasks required by assignment and course materials: ideas original, often insightful, going beyond parrotting ideas in the cours | essay controlled by clear, precise, well-defined thesis: is sophisticated in both statement and insight | well-chosen examples; persuasive reasoning used to develop and support thesis consistently: uses quotations and citations effectively; causal connections between ideas are evident | appropriate, clear and smooth transitions; arrangement of paragraphs seems particularly apt and logical | uses sophisticated sentences effectively; usually chooses words aptly; observes conventions of written English and manuscript format; makes few minor or technical errors |
Well Developed (10 pts.) | shows a good understanding of the texts, ideas and methods of the assignment; goes beyond the obvious; may have one minor factual or conceptual inconsistency | clear, specific, argumentative thesis central to the essay; may have left minor terms undefined | pursues thesis consistently: develops a main argument with clear major points and appropriate textual evidence and supporting detail; makes an effort to organize paragraphs topically | distinct units of thought in paragraphs controlled by specific and detailed topic sentences; clear transitions between developed, cohering, and logically arranged paragraphs that are internally cohesive and could be outlined | some mechanical difficulties or stylistic problems; may make occasional problematic word choices or awkward syntax errors; a few spelling or punctuation errors or cliché; usually presents quotations effectively |
Developing Needs More Drafts (8 pts.) | shows an understanding of the basic ideas and information involved in the assignment; may have some factual, interpretive, or conceptual errors | general thesis or controlling idea; but may not yet define several central terms | only partially develops the argument; shallow analysis; some ideas and generalizations undeveloped or unsupported; makes limited use of textual evidence; fails to integrate quotations appropriately | some awkward transitions; some brief, weakly unified or undeveloped paragraphs; arrangement may not appear entirely natural; contains extraneous information | more frequent wordiness; several unclear or awkward sentences; imprecise use of words or over-reliance on passive voice; one or two major grammatical errors (subject-verb agreement, comma splice, etc.); effort to present quotations accurately |
Needs Significant Work Before Submitting (6 pts.) | shows inadequate command of course materials or has significant factual and conceptual errors; does not respond directly to the demands of the assignment; confuses some significant ideas | thesis vague or not central to argument; central terms not defined | frequently only narrates or merely summarizes; digresses from one topic to another without developing ideas or terms; makes insufficient or awkward use of textual evidence | wanders from one topic to another; illogical arrangement of ideas; paragraphs could be randomly rearranged | some major grammatical or proofreading errors (subject-verb agreement; sentence fragments); language marred by clichés, colloquialisms, repeated inexact word choices; inappropriate quotations or citations format |
Needs Fundamental Start-up Work (4 pts.) | writer has not understood lectures, readings, discussion, or assignment | no discernible thesis | little or no development; may list facts or misinformation; uses no quotations or fails to cite sources or plagiarizes | no transitions; incoherent paragraphs; suggests poor planning or no serious revision | numerous grammatical errors and stylistic problems seriously distract from the argument |
Essay Progress Score: ________ tot. pts. | _____pts. | _____pts. | _____pts. | _____pts. | _____pts. |
Notes for improving the next draft:
“Ninety percent of the job of producing effective writing is re-writing.” JEF
Organizational Behaviour Concepts Controversies Applications
ISBN: 978-0132310314
6th Canadian Edition
Authors: Nancy Langton, Stephen P. Robbins, Timothy A. Judge, Katherine Breward