Second Question for Discussion Assignment Second Question for Discussion AssignmentSecond Question for Discussion Assignment Read the passage from Question $4\mathrm{.}9\mathrm{.}3,$ and if you decide it is an argument work out a proper reconstruction for it$.$ If it is not an argument, defend why you believe it can be viewed as fulfilling some other function of language than the persuasive function. If it is an argument make sure to include these steps in your reconstruction: Step $1.$ Underline or bold the conclusion $($See p$.68$ of textbook for an example$).$ Square bracket and number the premises $($P$1),$ etc. using the argument as printed in the textbook $($transcribe it carefully$)$: Step $2.$ Re$-$state the premises and conclusion more precisely and provide and number any missing premises $($See p$.80$ of textbook for an example$).$Do this as a list, with the conclusion at the bottom. Step $3.$ Draw a tree diagram of the re$-$stated argument $($see p$.79-81$ of textbook for instructions and examples$).$ You can cut$-$and$-$paste from the following samples and modify them as necessary. Use the "Pre$-$formatted" text attribute in the Moodle text editor $($access it from the $"$A$"$ icon in the text editor menu bar$).$This will prevent the editor from $"$re$-$formatting" your diagram. P$1---$P$2|$C P$1---$P$2---$P$3|$C P$1$ P$2\backslash /$C P$1$P$2$P$3\backslash |/$C P$1---$P$2$P$3\backslash /$ C P$1---$P$2$ P$3---$P$4\backslash /$C