Section 5: Case matching (1/8 pt each) (fill in the blanks with the appropriate lettersif you answer in any other manner, i.e. filling in the blank with the case name, I will grade the answer as incorrect)

1. ____ Justifying a stop and frisk requires more than an anonymous tip without any substantiation

2. ____ 4^th Amendment doesn't prohibit all unwelcome intrusions on private property, just the unreasonable ones

3. ____ Would a reasonable person have believed they were not free to leave an encounter with law enforcement?

4. ____ Exceptions to the warrant requirement based on a general category of criminal behavior are constitutionally problematic

5. ____ 4^th Amendment permits protective sweeps

6. ____ Diminished culpability leads to less penological justification for juvenile capital punishment

7. ____ Is the right fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty?

8. ____ Defense counsel are not allowed to purposefully discriminate on the ground of race in exercising peremptory challenges

9. ____ Assuring that criminal suspects are afforded their privilege against self-incrimination

10. ____ Reasonable for police to rely on the belief that someone had the authority to consent to the search of an apartment

11. ____ Court debated amongst itself the privacy right an incarcerated individual might have in their cell

12. ____ The knock-and-announce requirement provides little deterrence against 4^th Amendment-violative conduct on the part of law enforcement.

13. ____ Preventing the destruction of evidence is an exigent circumstance justifying warrantless searches

14. ____ Law enforcement must have lawful right of access to a vehicle in order to search it pursuant to the auto exception

15. ____ Court incorporated protection against unreasonable searches and seizures but not the exclusionary rule

16. ____ To be successful in challenging capital punishment under equal protection, a petitioner must prove that decision makers acted with discriminatory intent in their case

17. ____ Factual circumstances such as a risk to public safety can justify not providing Miranda warnings immediately before any questioning of a suspect takes place

18. ____ While the Confrontation Clause is subject to procedural limitations, reliability of evidence against a criminal defendant is to be tested by cross-examination, not by the court.

19. ____ 6A right to a trial by jury applies to those accused of serious crimes as determined by maximum imprisonment, generally set at 6 months

20. ____ In order for a CO to have used excessive force for 8A purposes, that force had to have been used maliciously and sadistically to cause harm

21. ____ Veracity and reliability are considered as part of the totality of the circumstances when determining probable cause

22. ____ Magistrate's ideas about scope of a warrant are only guaranteed when the warrant is particular in its descriptions

23. ____ Incorporation of the exclusionary rule stemmed from a lewd and lascivious materials case

24. ____ Participation in public school sports limits students' privacy interests

25. ____ When two parties with authority to consent to a search are present and one expressly denies that consent, any subsequent warrantless search is not lawful

26. ____ Totality of the circumstances analysis determines the voluntariness of a confession

27. ____ If general deterrence is not achieved by suppression, then the exclusionary rule should not apply

28. ____ 6^th Amendment requires presence of counsel at post-indictment lineups

1. Lewis v. US(1996)
2. Mapp v. Ohio(1961)
3. Collins v. Virginia(2018)
4. McDonald v. City of Chicago(2010)
5. US v. Mendenhall(1995)
6. Illinois v. Gates(1983)
7. People v. Stewart(2023)
8. Vernonia School District v. Acton(1995)
9. Georgia v. Randolph(2006)
10. Roper v. Simmons(2005)
11. Hudson v. Michigan(2006)
12. Hudson v. McMillian(1992)
13. New York v. Quarles(1984)
14. Wolf v. Colorado(1949)
15. Florida v. JL(2000)
16. Richards v. WI (1997)
17. Georgia v. McCollum(1992)
18. US v. Wade(1967)
19. Illinois v. Rodriguez(1990)
20. Groh v. Ramirez(2004)
21. Hemphill v. NY (2022)
22. Hudson v. Palmer(1984)
23. Caniglia v. Strom(2021)
24. Kentucky v. King(2011)
25. Maryland v. Buie(1990)
26. Arizona v. Evans(1995)
27. Miranda v. Arizona(1966)
28. McCleskey v. Kemp(1987)