Section III. State whether the following arguments are deductive or inductive and what kind of deductive or inductive argument they are in particular. Look at the list below of different kinds of deductive and inductive arguments for help. The same kind of argument (e.g. from definition, causal inference) may appear more than once. This section is worth a total of 25 points. 1. We live in a democracy which means we decide things by vote. 2. Given what's happened the first couple of weeks of the season, you'll be the big fantasy football winner this year, prediction 3. I know Steve and he will not crack during his internship. Casual inference 4. My experience has shown me that all wives are jealous. Generalization 5. Either things will remain as they are or the revolution will commence. Things will not remain as they are. Thus the revolution will commence. Categorical syllogism Causal Inference Argument based on mathematics Argument based on authority Disjunctive syllogism Generalization Hypothetical syllogism Prediction Argument from definition Argument from signs Section IV. Use the counter-example method fremember the two-steps of that method) to prove that the following deductive arguments are invalid. Credit will be given based on how well you have performed each step. This section is worth a total of 25 points. 1. Hitler was an un-just ruler. After all if Hitler was an un-just ruler then he oppressed his citizens and Hitler oppressed his citizens. 2. Some terrorist acts are not cowardly instances because all terrorist acts are aggressive behaviors and some aggressive behaviors are not cowardly instances