Select all that apply

What was the court's ANALYSIS $($legal reasoning$)$ in the Timothy v Keetch case? $($Choose TWO correct answers$)$

Multiple select question.

The Timothys were not required to check for prior UCC filings on the horse because the Keetches represented that they owned the horse free and clear

Nothing in the record suggested anything that would $$serve as a warning$$ that the Keetchs were being deceived.

Nothing in the record suggested anything that would $$serve as a warning$$ that the Timothys were being deceived.

The Keetchs were required to check for prior UCC filings on the horse because the Timothy's represented that they owned the horse free and clear