Select the best answer choice.

Owen Owner has an electronics store. On December $8,$ he sent a written request to a Comey Computer Manufacturer asking for the price of a particular computer that was on sale for the holidays. Comey Computer Manufacturer sent a written reply with a catalog listing the prices and description of all of his available computers. The letter stated that the terms of sale were cash within $45$ days of delivery. On December $16,$ by retiurn letter, the store owner ordered the computer, enclosing a check for $$4,400,$ the listed price. Immediately on receipt of the order and check, the manufacturer informed Owen Owner that there had been a pricing mistake in the catalog, which should have quoted the price as $$4,900$ for that computer. Owen Owner refused to pay the additional $$500.$

In a suit for damages, will Comey Computer Manufacturer prevail over Owen Owner?

No$,$ because Owen Owner's December $16$ letter was a proper acceptance of Comey Computer Manufacturer's offer.

Yes, because his first communication stated terms calling for cash within $45$ days of delivery.

Yes, because Comey Computer Manufacturer's first communication did not constitute an offer.

Yes, because there was a mistake as to price.