Select the best answer choice.

Regarding assigned case Pittsley v$.$ Houser, $875$ P$\mathrm{.}2$d $232($Idaho App. $1994)$:

The court held that the UCC was applicable to this transaction, since the predominant factor in the contract was the sale of goods.

Which of the following is the fact of consequence the court used to make this determination?

The parties' intent for entering the contract; since Pittsley entered into the contract to get a particular good, rather than a particular service.

The adequacy of the consideration exchanged; since Pittsley paid some value for carpet, and other value for the removal and installation of carpet.

The parties' intent for entering the contract; since Pittsley entered into the contract to get a particular service, rather than a particular good.

All of these answer choices are correct.