Select the best answer choice.

Regarding assigned case Vizcaino v$.$ Microsoft Corp., $97$ F$\mathrm{.}3$d $1187(9$th Cir. $1996)$:

How did the Court of Appeals interpret Microsoft's Employee Stock Purchase Plan $($ESPP$)?$

Using the objective manifestation theory of contracts, the court imputes to Microsoft's ESPP a meaning that extends participation to employees, including common law employees.

Using the objective mutual assent theory of contracts, the court imputes to Microsoft's ESPP a meaning that extends participation to employees, including common law employees.

Using the objective manifestation theory of contracts, the court imputes to Microsoft's ESPP a meaning that does not extend participation to common law employees.

Using the objective mutual assent theory of contracts, the court imputes to Microsoft's ESPP a meaning that does not extend participatin to common law employees.