Question: Select the best answer choice. Regarding assigned case Weingart v . Directoire Restaurant, Inc., 3 3 3 N . Y . S . 2 d

Select the best answer choice.
Regarding assigned case Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc., 333 N.Y.S.2d806(N.Y.,1972):
Buster Douglas was not the restaurant's employee. Why did the court determine his negligence could nevertheless be imputed to the restaurant?
Because Douglas acted with apparent authority.
Because Douglas acted with actual authority.
Because Douglas acted with inherent authority.
Because Douglas acted with inherent actual authority.
 Select the best answer choice. Regarding assigned case Weingart v. Directoire

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!