Question: Select the best answer choice. Regarding assigned case Weingart v . Directoire Restaurant, Inc., 3 3 3 N . Y . S . 2 d
Select the best answer choice.
Regarding assigned case Weingart v Directoire Restaurant, Inc., NYSNY:
Buster Douglas was not the restaurant's employee. Why did the court determine his negligence could nevertheless be imputed to the restaurant?
Because Douglas acted with apparent authority.
Because Douglas acted with actual authority.
Because Douglas acted with inherent authority.
Because Douglas acted with inherent actual authority.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
