Select the best answer choice.

$($Who$?)$ M$$ke Jones bought a used $1968$ Chevrolet Camaro from the Wright Brothers, owners Cheesy Discount Auto Sales. Unknown to Mike Jones or the Wright Brothers, the car had bee stolen. In fact, when they first bought the car, the Wright brothers had obtained tag receipts from what turned out to be the car thief and had subsequently registered the car in his name. Mike Jones had received all prior documentation upon purchase of the car. However, the Fed Bureau of Investigation $($FBI$)$ seized the car from Mike Jones and returned the car to the origir owner. Mike Jones sued the Wright Brothers, alleging, among other things, breach of warrant of title. The jury awarded Mike Jones $$4,500,$ the purchase price of the car. The Wright Brothe appealed.

What is the most likely result on appeal?

The verdict will be reversed because a void title is good title, and a thief can transfer a void title to the Wright Brothers.

The verdict will be reversed because a voidable title is good title, and a thief can transfer a voidable title to the Wright Brothers.

The verdict will be affirmed because a voidable title is no title, and the thief could not transfer good title to the Wright Brothers.

The verdict will be affirmed because a void title is no title, and the thief could not transfer good title to the Wright Brothers.