Select the best answerchoice.

Kodak Camera makes and sels a patented single$-$use camera. A consumer typically buys the camera, takes a roll of phatas, sends the entire camera off for procrssing, and reoelves her photos back from the processos. If the consumer wants to tabe more photos, she buys another single use cameral. Motophoto is in the business of processing such pictures. When it rockives a single$-$use camera from a consumer. it carefully popens the camera, remowes and processes the film : and retirns the firlshed photos. But it does not then tispose of the single use camern. Rather Motophoto inserts a new roll af film, resets the film counter, tors the damage it did in opering the camera, dears the camera off, and seils the used camera to consumers. Kodak suies MotoPhoto for intringement arsizy: that MotoPhoto is making end selling the patented device without authority.

Is MotoPhoto intringing?

Na$.$ once a pasented product is sold the patemiee no longer has amy rights: the subsequent users can make. we$.$ repali, recorstruct, and sell then patented impention.

Yes everv ebemert: of Kodak's patent claim is met by MotePthoto's device, and MotoPhoto has no apolicabit defeme.

No$,$ MotoPtiota has repared the paterned product, which is a permisitie rigth of subsequent owsers.

Yes, Motoptiona has reconstrusted the pasented product, which is not a permissitice right of sutsequent owners.