Select the best explanation for the comic drawn in response to a U.S. Supreme Court decision. Group of answer choices In Dobbs v Jackson, the Supreme Court decided that the U.S Constitution does not confer a right to an abortion. Hence, Texas' law allowing individuals to sue anybody who aids in an abortion was declared constitutional in this decision. In Dobbs v Jackson, the Supreme Court decided that the U.S Constitution does not specifically mention a lot of specific rights that many assume (right to an abortion, right to privacy, right to not be defamed with lies). Thus, all of these unspecified rights have no protection in the U.S. Constitution. Thus, Hence, Mississippi's law banning nearly all abortions after 15 weeks' gestational age is not unconstitutional. In Dobbs v Jackson, the Supreme Court decided that the U.S Constitution does not confer a right to an abortion. Hence, Mississippi's law banning nearly all abortions after 15 weeks' gestational age is not unconstitutional. In Dobbs v Jackson, the Supreme Court decided that the U.S Constitution does not specifically mention any medical issues or medical rights. Thus, Hence, Mississippi's law banning nearly all abortions after 15 weeks' gestational age is not unconstitutional