Select the case name that corresponds with each description below. At least one case name will be unused.

Select the case name that corresponds with each description below. At least one case name will be unused. Plain language of statute indicates a legislative intent to exclude common law rules; Laws were duplicative (significantly overlapped); therefore, legislature must have intended to replace common law with UCC To subject an out-of-state defendant to personal jurisdiction in a forum court, due process requires that the defendant have minimum contacts with the forum state so as not to offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice; minimum contacts requires one of the following: 1) activities of non-resident are systematic and continuous for a substantial period of time, 2) activities of non-resident are isolated or occasional contacts purposefully directed to forum, 3) defendant's contacts with the forum state are such that the defendant should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there, 4) defendant's activities are connected to the action that gives rise to the harm Best interpretation of "principal place of business" (for purposes of determining personal jurisdiction) is "nerve center" approach, meaning the place where corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities CSA is constitutional use of Commerce Clause power even when applied to intrastate activity like homeproduced drugs, because such activity can substantially affect the interstate market for controlled substances 441b 's restriction on corporations fails the strict scrutiny test-it is an unconstitutional restriction on free speech; however, 441 b's disclaimer and disclosure requirements serve a compelling interest and are constitutional under the strict scrutiny test