Select the most correct alternative related to Case Study #$1,$ considering the treatment given to data.

Group of answer choices

If the system was moved to the cloud, a few changes would be recommended. One of them would be to redesign the database to use NoSQL or file systems $($depending on the "size" of the data$),$ which are more appropriate ways to store data on the Cloud if the Cloud Consumer wants to use some of the most important cloud properties, such as scalability and elasticity. It also could improve performance as processing overhead and latency are big issues with relational databases on the Cloud.

If the system was moved to the cloud, no changes in database design would be needed. Relational databases usually work well on the Cloud, otherwise the LAMP stack wouldn't be so popular. The only would be an issue if vertical scaling couldn't be applied because vertical scaling in Clouds is usually very cost$-$effective and not very complex.

If the system was moved to the cloud, a few changes would be recommended. One of them would be to redesign the database to use distributed relational databases. This strategy also could improve performance as processing overhead and latency are not big issues with distributed relational databases on the Cloud.

If the system was moved to the cloud, no changes in database design would be needed. Relational databases usually work well on the Cloud, otherwise the LAMP stack wouldn't be so popular. This is the case even if data volumes increase significantly and scaling is needed.