Selma recently signed a contractual document with Olaf. She now believes, however, that she should be entitled to walk away from the agreement as a matter of fairness. She has phrased her argument in terms of the doctrine of non est factum. A court is most likely to agree with that argument

A if Selma failed to notice that the document did not reflect the agreement that she had reached with Olaf, even if Selma simply chose not to read the document.

B only if Olaf promised Selma that the agreement would not be legally enforceable even if she signed the document.

C if the document contained a space for Selma's signature, but she forgot to sign.

D if the document contains an exclusion clause that Olaf did not expressly draw to Selma's attention.

E if, even though Selma was not careless, there is a radical difference between what the document contains and what Selma thought it contained.