Sensitivity Report $2$

Variable Cells

Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable

Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient $($no$.$ of Increase Decrease

$($no$.$ of servings$)$ antioxidant units$)$

$B$$16$ Snack bar $1\mathrm{.}25003145148657$

$C$$16$ Chocolate $1\mathrm{.}875061751151981\mathrm{.}66$

$9.$ Refer to the Sensitivity Report $2$ above. The allowable increase and decrease for snack bars can be interpreted as:

A$.$ The no$.$ of servings will remain the same as the original solution as long as the no$.$ of antioxidants range from $3088$ units to $4631$ units.

B$.$ The no$.$ of servings will remain the same as the original solution as long as the no$.$ of antioxidants range from $57$ units to $1486$ units.

C$.$ The no$.$ of antioxidant units cannot be reduced further since reduced cost is $0.$

$10.$ Refer to the Sensitivity Report $2$ above. Snack bar$$s reduced cost of $0$ grams indicates that snack bars are binding and prevent the model from further maximizing its objective, total antioxidants.

A$.$ True

B$.$ False