Sharon developed a tennis$-$oriented condominium $($condo$)$ project and called the project Tennis Heaven. Tennis Heaven consisted of $50$ condos, $5$ tennis courts, and parking facilities. Sharon recorded a $$Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions$$ in the chain of title of all $50$ units before sales began. The Declaration established a homeowner$$s association $($HOA$)$ to collect dues and enforce the restrictions. One of the restrictions in the Declaration provided: $$Tenants of any unit owner will be entitled to use the tennis courts; however, nonresident unit owners are prohibited from using the tennis courts during the period of such tenancy.$$ Benny bought one of the condos and moved in$,$ but had no actual knowledge of the Declaration provisions because he had not read them. Three years later, Benny purchased a new house nearby Tennis Heaven and leased his condo to Ed who entered into possession. Benny knew that Ed didn$$t play tennis and wouldn$$t be using the courts so Benny continued using the Tennis Heaven courts. Several months later, Benny received notice from the HOA warning him that he would be subject to a fine if he violated the terms of the Declaration$$s restrictions on use of the tennis courts. Assuming the jurisdiction uses the Nahrstedt test, would this restriction be enforceable against Benny as a nonresident unit owner?