show all work

Critical Thinking Fallacies Multiple Choice Circle Correct Answer 1. Objecting to an action on the grounds that once it's taken, it will lead to similar but less desirable ons until some atrocity occurs. In other words, if we do something, then this will happen, and this will happen, and so on. (domino effect). A. Appeal to Force B. Slippery Slope C. False Dilemma 2. Word or phrase that experiences a shift in meaning; look for words used twice in separate sections of arguments. A. Equivocation B. Prejudicial Language C. Red Herring 3. Literally means grant the conclusion. Restating conclusions as premises. Using conclusions that have not as yet been proven to support conclusions. The question, a questionable premises, begs for an answer. WATCH USING CONCLUSIONS TO PROVE OTHER CONCLUSIONS. A. Attacking the Person B. Ambiguity C. Begging the Question 4. Use of language that biases you in favor or arguer's position without giving evidence to adopt position or go against position. A. Prejudicial Language C. Appeal to Popular Opinion he Spice Girls are pro-choice, and some am I. Girl power! B. Red Herring 5. Citing someone who is popular but not an expert on the subject. A. Appeal to Pity B. False Division C. Appeal to Authority 6. ad hominem (toward the man) remarks, agrumentum ad personam (toward the person) remarks: arguing that the person's point of view should be doubted because that person has bad character. A. Prejudicial Language B. Attacking the Person/Name-Calling C. Slippery Slope 7. If you accept the definition, the argument is over. EXAMPLE Real men don't eat quiche. A. Overgeneralization B. Persuasive Definition C. Appeal to Popular Opinion