show competency in constructing a research-based argumentative piece of writing.

• Demonstrate critical thinking and critical analysis skills, including your use of a research based argumentation
• Effectively organize your paper. paper should have a clear introduction, thesis statement, multiple body paragraphs supporting the thesis statement, a counterpoint within the essay, and a clear conclusion.
• Use at least four sources.
  • Using a source means quoting, paraphrasing, and/or summarizing it, including a citation each time it is being used.
  • Reference each source you use in your reference list.
  • You should use the following sources:
    • Three peer-reviewed academic journal sources from Keiser's e-Library
    • At least one additional credible source, which may include the e-Library, government source or another reputable location.
    • Beyond the four required sources, additional sources are optional.

Milestone 1

Milestone 1 Example Assignment

Topic 1

Human trafficking is a severe problem that has an impact on my criminal justice

profession and subject of study I'm interested in, since it entails the exploitation of vulnerable

populations, the violation of people's rights and dignity, and the difficulty of implementing the

law internationally. There are two different types of thoughts regarding how to handle this

problem: the first is to take a more punitive and deterrent approach by toughening up on the

penalties and prosecuting traffickers; the other is to take a more preventive and protective

approach by dealing with the underlying causes and offering assistance and services to the

victims. I believe that a comprehensive and well-balanced strategy that incorporates both

approaches is necessary, as it will not only lessen the demand and supply of human trafficking

but also empower and heal the survivors. The politicians and officials who have the authority to

decide on the funding and legislative framework for the fight against human trafficking would be

my target audience. This audience may protest on the grounds that putting such an approach into

practice would be very resource- and coordination-intensive, both domestically and globally, and

that it would conflict with other interests or objectives.

Topic 2

The use of technology to carry out numerous illicit behaviors that hurt people, businesses,

and society as a whole makes cybercrime a significant issue that impacts my vocation or field of

study in criminal justice. There are two schools of thought regarding how to handle this problem:

the first is to take a more proactive and preventive approach, strengthening the cybersecurity of

networks and systems and teaching users how to stay safe online; the other is to take a more

reactive and punitive approach, bolstering the legal and law enforcement response to

cybercriminals and imposing more severe penalties and sanctions (Welance, 2023). The public

and commercial sector players and decision-makers in charge of cyberspace security and

governance would be my target audience. This audience may protest by pointing out that striking

a balance between the two strategies would involve significant financial resources, international

cooperation, and trade-offs with regard to innovation, civil rights, and privacy.

Summary Paragraph

The security and well-being of people, companies, and society are seriously threatened by

cybercrime, which calls for a comprehensive, well-balanced response that includes both

proactive prevention and reactive punishment. Due to my familiarity with cybersecurity

legislation and assaults, interest in the role of technology in criminal justice, and availability of

trustworthy resources, I picked this problem over human trafficking. My proficiency with the

most recent cybersecurity laws and regulations, as well as my ability to assess various

cyberattack kinds and their effects, are my research and writing skills on this topic. Finding

reliable, current data and statistics on cybercrime is one of my problems, as is addressing any

potential moral or legal quandaries that may come from striking a balance between privacy and

security. My goal in writing this essay is to influence readers to consider cybercrime seriously

and to back a comprehensive, team-based strategy to fight it. I urge the people in my audience to

think about this: How can we prevent cybercrime from harming us or others without sacrificing

our liberties and rights?

feedback

your progress to the next step, remember that the question is the beginning of your argument. You are not really asking the audience what they think. You are telling them what you believe is the truth. Be sure that truth is supported by reason and evidence. Your question should be geared to match the argument.

Milestone 2

Milestone 2 Assignment

Section 1

Due to the serious threat that cybercrime poses to people, companies, and society as a

whole, successful mitigation requires a diverse strategy. As a student of criminal justice who is

particularly interested in the application of technology in law enforcement, I support a plan that

combines proactive preventive measures with reactive punishment to deal with this urgent

problem. According to my stance, preventing cybercrime necessitates a holistic approach that

combines punitive measures like increased legal action and stiffer fines for offenders with

preventive measures like bolstering cybersecurity and user education.

Although there are those who advocate for a purely proactive or reactive approach to

cybercrime, a well-rounded approach that incorporates both prevention and punishment is

necessary to properly tackle this intricate and always changing danger.

Section 2

Concerns over the viability and cost-effectiveness of putting a comprehensive strategy

into action, as well as any inconsistencies with civil liberties and privacy rights, may be among

the anticipated queries or objections. It is understood that putting into practice a thorough

strategy to combat cybercrime might call for substantial financial resources and cross-national

collaboration. Nonetheless, the investment is justified by the long-term advantages of lowering

cyberthreats and defending individual rights. Additionally, precautions can be taken to lessen the

possibility of any violation of privacy and civil liberties.

Section 3

Policymakers, public servants, and business executives in charge of cybersecurity

governance and decision-making make up my target audience. It is crucial to make this audience

aware of the significance of taking a fair and impartial stance when it comes to the prevention

and prosecution of cybercrime. My goal is to persuade the audience to recognize the necessity of

a comprehensive strategy for combating cybercrime and advocate for policies and initiatives

prioritizing prevention and punishment measures.

Section 4

My strategy for persuading my audience will combine pathos, ethos, and logos.

Establishing my ethos will involve showcasing my experience with technology and criminal

justice. When the possible effects of cybercrime on people and society are emphasized, pathos

will be generated. Using case studies, data, and expert opinions to demonstrate the efficacy of a

balanced strategy, logos will be used.

Section 5

1. As part of my research strategy, I'll be gathering academic papers and studies on

cybercrime prevention and punishment tactics using resources like ProQuest Central and

EBSCOhost. Key words for my research include " statistics on cybercrime," " prevention

cybercrime," " penalties for cybercrime," and " legal repercussions for cybercrime." I

hope to establish the foundation for a thorough and compelling argumentative essay on

striking a balance between punishment and prevention in the fight against cybercrime by

addressing these issues in my proposal.

Feed Back

I understand what your issue is, but you have not written a thesis statement, and so your claim (what it is you want to argue) is difficult to understand. What is the "well-rounded approach" for which you advocate? What is the "always changing danger"? Why is the problem so intricate? You state that "pathos will be generated." How? Remember, a thesis statement is claim and a reason. You must have both. Your audience is still too broad. You should pick one group as your primary audience and write to that group. Remember to write this argument only to those who need to be persuaded about this claim.

Milestone 3

For individuals, businesses, and society at large, cybercrime is a serious concern.

Reactive punishment combined with proactive preventive actions is the only effective way to

tackle this problem. Both preventive steps like enhancing cybersecurity and user education as

well as punitive ones like tougher penalties and more legal action against violators should be part

of this strategy. The investment in preventative and punitive measures is justified by the long-

term benefits of reducing cyberthreats and preserving individual rights, notwithstanding doubts

about the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of putting a complete strategy into place.

Policymakers, government employees, and corporate leaders in charge of cybersecurity

governance and decision-making are among the people this essay is intended for. Ensuring that

they understand the significance of maintaining an equitable and unbiased position for the

avoidance and legalization of cybercrime is imperative.

Pathos, ethos, and logos will all be employed in tandem to persuade the audience. The

author's experience with technology and criminal justice will be highlighted through pathos, and

the potential impacts of cybercrime on individuals and society will be emphasized through ethos.

To prove the effectiveness of a well-rounded approach, Logos will present facts, case examples,

and expert perspectives. Using EBSCOhost and ProQuest Central as well as other resources, the

research method will collect academic publications and studies on cybercrime prevention and

punishment strategies. The research's key phrases include "cybercrime statistics," "cybercrime

prevention," "cybercrime penalties," and "cybercrime legal repercussions."

Imagine a society in which everyone can achieve their full potential and access to

education is unrestricted by financial means, regardless of background. This essay challenges the

notion that higher education is primarily the domain of the wealthy and well-off, contending that

all citizens should have the means to acquire knowledge and reap the benefits of a college

degree. When people have access to education, their potential blossoms, much like seeds planted

in rich soil and given water and sunlight. Limiting access to higher education impediments

intellectual and personal progress, just as depriving seeds of their basic need slows their growth.

To sum up, the concept of educational justice challenges the popular belief that going to

college is a privilege and offers hope for a more inclusive future. Readers who are receptive to

the notion of educational reform but skeptical of its feasibility are likely to find resonance with

this tactic

Feedback

Cynthia, but this is not an outline. Instead, it is kind of like your proposal. I do not see a thesis statement. Remember, a thesis statement is only one or two sentences that state your controversial claim. Then you need to state the reasons as to why you believe the claim is true. Next, you should state the topic sentences of your essay. Those sentences should match with the reasons you state in your thesis statement. You do not have a section that outlines the opposing veiwpoint.