Since it uses some tools "designed for use by an average$-$sized male," a local business hires only "average sized males" for jobs in its plant, noting a safety concern. If a female applicant for a job is not hired and sues, a court would most likely rule that:

$21.$ Since it uses some tools "designed for use by an average$-$sized male," a local business hires only "average sized males" for jobs in its plant, noting a safety concern. If a female applicant for a job is not hired and sues, a court would most likely rule that:

E$.$ the employer did not violate Title VII because any adverse impact its hiring criteria created was justified as job$-$related and consistent with business necessity

C$.$ the employer violated Title VII by facially discriminating against women

D$.$ the employer did not violate Title VII because the employer could establish a BFOQ based on its safety concerns

B$.$ the employer violated Title VII by not attempting to accommodate women so that they could work in the plant

A$.$ the employer violated Title VII because the selection criterion of size has an adverse impact on women and is not job related nor consistent with business necessity.

Question at position $13$

$13$

$1$ point