Situation:

Mark, a cybersecurity analyst at DCS Inc., has a significant role in protecting the

company's information assets. During routine security assessments, he uncovers a

significant vulnerability in the network infrastructure. Exploiting this vulnerability could

have severe consequences, exposing sensitive customer data and putting valuable

intellectual property at risk. The urgency to address the issue becomes paramount.

Ethical Dilemma:

Mark faces an ethical dilemma regarding the appropriate course of action. On one

hand, he recognises the importance of promptly addressing the vulnerability to protect

the company's assets, maintain customer privacy, and safeguard intellectual property.

Ignoring the issue could lead to devastating outcomes, including data breaches,

financial losses, and damage to the company's reputation. On the other hand, Mark

must carefully consider the implications of disclosing the vulnerability.

The decision to disclose the vulnerability involves navigating a complex landscape.

Mark must consider the potential operational disruptions that disclosure may cause.

Addressing the vulnerability could require immediate actions that may impact critical

systems and processes. Additionally, compliance with data protection regulations and

other legal requirements must be considered to avoid potential legal consequences.

Additionally, Mark must weigh the impact of disclosure on the company's reputation

and public perception. Transparency and responsible disclosure are critical, but Mark

must balance them with the potential negative consequences, such as reputational

damage and loss of customer trust. Finding the right balance between transparency

and protecting the company's interests becomes crucial.

In summary, Mark faces an ethical dilemma in determining the best course of action

regarding the vulnerability. He must weigh the urgency to address the issue against the

potential impact of disclosure, considering operational disruptions, legal obligations,

and the company's reputation. By carefully evaluating these factors, Mark can navigate

this ethical dilemma while mitigating risk and protecting the organisation's interests.