Situations for Discussion, No$.2$ @ p$.368($Chapter $14)$ of the Duplessis

textbook $($Full text of the case, quoted from the textbook$)$:

$$Edie$,$ Alma, and Tim established a restaurant called EATs. Edie, a retired

teacher, invested $$20,000$ in the venture, and Alma and Tim each invested

$$10,000.$ Edie, Alma, and Tim do not have a formal agreement concerning

the allocation of responsibilities, but they each take turns doing the

cooking. The serving and clean$-$up tasks are done by staff. One day, while

Edie was doing the cooking, Juan got food poisoning from his meal. Juan

intends to sue EATs, Edie, Alma, and Tim for damages of $$100,000.$ If Juan

is successful, how will the damages be allocated among the parties? If the

restaurant were incorporated under EATs Inc. and Edie owned $50\%$ of the

shares, Alma owned $25\%,$ and Tim owned $25\%,$ how would the damages

be allocated? What do these two situations illustrate about risk?