Smith Ltd is a small company established in Exeter some years ago. Over the last couple of years, the company has been facing tough competition from some newly established local businesses, which is reflected in decreasing sales and annual profit of the company. From the beginning of last year, the managers of Smith Ltd have been considering two mutually exclusive projects (Project A and Project B) in order to widen the range of products offered by the company. The managers believe that this will reduce the vulnerability of Smith Ltd to local competition and improve the company's profitability.

 

Project A requires an initial capital investment of £160,000 with an expected economic life of five years, and no residual value at the end of the five-year period. Annual accounting profit after depreciation is expected to be £40,000 over the economic life of the project.

 

Project B requires an initial capital investment of £80,000 with an expected economic life of four years, and no residual value at the end of the four-year period. Expected sales and costs are summarised in the table below:

 The information below is relevant for both projects:

 

All sales are expected to be cash sales, and all costs are expected to be paid for in cash as and when incurred.

 

Depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis over the economic life of each project.

 

Depreciation is the only adjustment difference between accounting profit and cash flows for each project.


Required:

(a)

(i) Calculate for each project the payback period (Assume that cash flows will occur evenly throughout the year).

 

(ii) Advise the management of Smith limited as to which to which project to select in (a) (i) above.


(b)

(i) Calculate the NPV of Project B using a cost of capital of 9%. (Assume that all cash flows occur at the year-end).

(ii) Comment on the viability of the project.

(c) For Project B: calculate the breakeven point in sales revenue for year 3.
(d) In the third year of Project B, 700 units of the product were budgeted to be produced and sold.
(i) Calculate for the third year the unit cost of the product under marginal costing and absorption costing.
(ii) What would be the impact of the difference in unit costs calculated in (d) (i) on the year-end profit under the two costing methods?
(iii) If the production exceeds sales, explain which method would expect to show the higher profit, marginal costing or absorption costing.

Transcribed Image Text:

Sales () Material cost () Labour cost () Fixed cost excluding depreciation () Year 1 Year 2 110,000 130,000 40,000 50,000 20,000 24,000 10,000 10,000 Year 3 148,000 59,000 27,600 10,000 Year 4 151,000 60,500 28,200 10,000 Sales () Material cost () Labour cost () Fixed cost excluding depreciation () Year 1 Year 2 110,000 130,000 40,000 50,000 20,000 24,000 10,000 10,000 Year 3 148,000 59,000 27,600 10,000 Year 4 151,000 60,500 28,200 10,000

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Certainly Lets tackle each of the required calculations step by step a i Calculate for each project the payback period Project A Initial investment 160000 Annual cash flow accounting profit depreciati... View the full answer