Question: Smithson, Inc. decided to implement the activity-based costing approach and was quite successful in its use. However, the controller is wondering if instead of only
Smithson, Inc. decided to implement the activity-based costing approach and was quite successful in its use. However, the controller is wondering if instead of only two activity cost pools, they should expand to three activity cost pools based on the following:
| Family Model | Deluxe Model | |||
| Direct labor costs | $73,200 | $146,400 | ||
| Machine hours | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||
| Setup hours | 200 | 800 | ||
| Packaging hours | 50 | 75 |
The estimated overhead of $439,200 is allocated as follows: machining activity cost pool $234,240, machine set up $165,920 and packaging $39,040.
Determine the overhead allocation for the family model and the deluxe model using three activity cost pools.
| Oerhead Allocation | ||
| Family model | $ | |
| Deluxe model | $ |
What is the difference in allocation between two activity cost pools and three activity cost pools? Is the difference in allocation worth using the third activity cost pool?
What is the difference in allocation between two activity cost pools and three activity cost pools? Is the difference in allocation worth using the third activity cost pool?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
