Solomon is a principal engineer at an environmental engineering consulting firm. His main role is to advise clients on what type of action to take when they are faced with risks and liabilities while conducting certain projects. In one case, Solomon had a client that wanted to expand their campus until it was within approximately 50 meters of a marshland. After construction of this extension, however, the client must ensure that a proper waste management plan is in place so that contamination will have minimal effect on the surrounding habitat. The client came up with a solution that satisfied, but did not go beyond, the bare minimum of state regulations. In other words, although Solomons client prioritized a cost-effective plan, the environment would be subject to a certain percentage of contamination that would, within five to ten years, stifle the marshlands flourishing. Please answer the following questions:

1) Consider the situation that Solomon and his client faces. Evaluate the clients plan that meets the minimum legal requirements based on the 5 ethical perspectives: Utilitarianism, Moral Rights/Universalism, Justice, Ethics of Care, and Virtue Ethics.

2) What solution do you recommend for the company that would be ethical under all five perspectives?