solve ASAP

D Question 41 5 pts is Mrs. Toolate entered into a verbal contract with her neighbour's son Justin for babysitting services in the evenings for her two kids. They agreed that the rate of pay would be a flat rate of $10 per evening which was based on about one or two hours an evening when it was needed. On a Friday night, Mrs. Toolate retained Justin's services to watch one child while the other went to their curling match. After the match Mrs. Toolate and a few other parents went out for a meal. By the time she got home they were gone for just over 4 hours, When she tried to pay Justin the $10 he refused to accept the money and said, "Sorry Mrs. Toolate, you were gone for 4 hours which is twice what our agreement is so you owe me $20". Mrs. Toolate then argued "you only watched one child not two, therefore I only owe you half which is $10". If the two were to go to court, what would the judge's ruling be? Mrs. Toolate would owe Justin $10 the agreement was a flat rate Mrs. Toolate would owe Justin $10 as he only did work twice as long but performed half the work by watching one child Mrs. Toolate would owe Justin $20 as the flat rate is based on a reasonable timeframe O Mrs. Toolate would owe Justin $20 as the same basic work is required regardless of number of children Both C and D