Some countries do not subscribe to the adversarial process as part of their court system, believing that is too combative, slow, and cumbersome and can lead to a "win at all cost" mentality among the lawyers. Rather, they use a non adversarial or inquisitorial system, in which the court or a part of the court is actively involved in determining the facts of the case $($as opposed to the court's being primarily an impartial referee, as in the adversarial system$).$ Your instructor asks you to participate in a pro$-$con group project concerning the adversarial process. Choose a side and make your defense.