Spratt and Watson were charged under sections $2(1)($a$)$ and $2(1)($b$)$ of the provincialAccess to Abortion Services Act as a result of their activities outside of a Vancouver healthclinic. Signs stating, "You shall not murder" and "Unborn Persons Have the Right to Live" were waved within a "bubble" or access zone outside the abortion clinic. The law aims toprotect women from interference in this zone. The accused argued that the law violated their freedom of expression.Question: Whose rights should be paramount in cases such as this?