Stakeholder identification Exercise Instructions 1. Read Chapter 3 and 4 of your text 2. Complete the following: Format of Assignment CASE Title Telus Ethics and Cellphone Tower Sites Case Database 2018 Harvard Business Publishing Relevant Learning LO 13 The Dynamics of Stakeholder tallene Outcomes LO 4 Stakeholder Matrix Mapping Brief Summary Telus had recently installed a cellphone tower on the University of Calgary property a che The addition of the tower was a response by the telecommunication company to the crew need for good cellphone reception on the University grounds. However, the placement of the tower achieve centre put it in what was considered a discouraged location. This placement the concern from worried parents about potential hazard from electromagnetic wwes. This concern was supported by World Health Organization reports on possible carcinogenic related to cancer efects of such waves. The report Identified children as being at even greater risk. The guidelines that defined "discouraged location was supported in both federal and municipal regulations. The parents concern stemmed from the fact that the tower was only 84 m away from the nearest play ground. The relevant regulations stipulated that the minimum distance should be about 300m. The parents also expressed frustration that they were not consulted in advance of the tower placement decision. This activism by the parents occurred after the tower placement decision had been made but before the tower was actually built. They were demanding that the tower placement should be changed. A central part of the argument was that while the tower placement may have been legal, it's contravention of the placement guidelines made it unethical Stakeholder identification Exercise Instructions 1. Read Chapter 3 and 4 of your text 2. Complete the following: Format of Assignment CASE Title Telus Ethics and Cellphone Tower Sites Case Database 2018 Harvard Business Publishing Relevant Learning LO 13 The Dynamics of Stakeholder tallene Outcomes LO 4 Stakeholder Matrix Mapping Brief Summary Telus had recently installed a cellphone tower on the University of Calgary property a che The addition of the tower was a response by the telecommunication company to the crew need for good cellphone reception on the University grounds. However, the placement of the tower achieve centre put it in what was considered a discouraged location. This placement the concern from worried parents about potential hazard from electromagnetic wwes. This concern was supported by World Health Organization reports on possible carcinogenic related to cancer efects of such waves. The report Identified children as being at even greater risk. The guidelines that defined "discouraged location was supported in both federal and municipal regulations. The parents concern stemmed from the fact that the tower was only 84 m away from the nearest play ground. The relevant regulations stipulated that the minimum distance should be about 300m. The parents also expressed frustration that they were not consulted in advance of the tower placement decision. This activism by the parents occurred after the tower placement decision had been made but before the tower was actually built. They were demanding that the tower placement should be changed. A central part of the argument was that while the tower placement may have been legal, it's contravention of the placement guidelines made it unethical