structure your answers using the ILAC Method. Students should demonstrate their ability to analyse the legal implications for each party involved and propose reasoned outcomes based on legal principles. Sheila then placed several product orders through Faizal and made direct payment to him after confirming the orders. When the goods were delivered to Bara Naga's main store, several items were found to be of lower quality than expected and not as represented in the promotional material circulated by Dato' Azman and Faizal. Due to a surge in orders, Faizal engaged Hafiz to assist with product deliveries in Penang. Several customers complained that their goods were not delivered as expected, and they had to collect them from a different location. Faizal later refused to pay Hafiz the agreed compensation for his services. Based on the facts above, evaluate the legal positions of the parties involved. Your discussion should be supported by relevant legal principles, statutory provisions, and case law where appropriate